SCIENCE AND EXPLANATION
SCIENCE
The Science is a way of
discovering what's in the universe and how those things work today, how they
worked in the past, and how they are likely to work in the future. Scientists
are motivated by the thrill of seeing or figuring out something that no one has
before. The knowledge generated by science is powerful and reliable. It can be
used to develop new technologies, treat diseases, and deal with many other
sorts of problems. Science is continually refining and expanding our knowledge
of the universe, and as it does, it leads to new questions for future
investigation. Science will never be "finished."
EXPLANATION
AND CONFIRMATION
In
philosophy, explanation is a set of claims that make the presence or occurrence
of an object, event, or condition of things intelligible. Human behavior
explanations usually appeal to the subject's beliefs and desires, as well as
other facts about him, and proceed on the assumption that the conduct under
consideration is rational. A belief is an attitude that something is true or
that a certain claim about the universe is correct. Someone's beliefs are
solely determined by what is intrinsic to that person. Belief in the reality
that anything happens, in my view, varies from person to person. The
explanation for why something happens may change from one observer to the next.
Confirmation entails giving grounds for believing that particular assertions
are accurate or false. All confirmation theories rely on assessments of how
well various alternative hypotheses explain for the data. Simply A confirmation
is evidence that something is true. Confirmation is the final verification or
evidence of something. The study of the logic by which scientific hypotheses
can be confirmed or rejected by evidence is known as confirmation theory. All
confirmation theories rely on assessments of how well various alternative
hypotheses explain for the data. The majority of modern confirmation theories
utilize probability functions to assess their strength.
What can we draw from this
recounting of some of the more notable recent attempts to create models of
scientific explanation? What critical concerns remain unresolved, and what are
the most potential future work directions? Of course, every attempt at
stock-taking will represent a certain point of view, but with that proviso in
mind, some findings are reasonable, if not entirely unfounded. Therefore, we
have to extend the knowledge about science and its explanations.
Comments
Post a Comment